tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11767021.post114701442652584619..comments2007-04-15T18:23:21.012-07:00burttdhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07978806237063461230noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11767021.post-1148806931191326122006-05-28T02:02:00.000-07:002006-05-28T02:02:00.000-07:00argh!<BR/><BR/>MeaningLESS<BR/><BR/>meaningLESS!!!<BR/><BR/>PGEpgeppshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00778075334003141988noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11767021.post-1148806903546747952006-05-28T02:01:00.000-07:002006-05-28T02:01:00.000-07:00My main problem with both T4G and Celebration is just that they're sloppily edited, and especially in the case of T4G too defined against certain temporary phases and phrases.<BR/><BR/>Celebration rambles on *forever* without much appearance of either outlining or prose styling; the result is a scattershot of good points hardly memorable or easily compared, lacking in organization. T4G obviously mimics the Chicago Statement and other Sic et Non style papers, but the kind of error in verbal presentation you point out is too common for me to take it very seriously. The fad will pass, the statement will, too, and those of us who think they're all wet--or perhaps just a bit damp--will be teaching and thinking what we teach and think, blithely unconcerned with what these teachers--who none of us would ever hear of, except on the few blogs where they're trumpted--want us to believe we have to agree with 'em on, or not be Christians.<BR/><BR/>Such statements are meaningful outside the body of Christ, and the blogosphere has yet to be initiated into that body....<BR/><BR/>Cheers,<BR/>PGEpgeppshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00778075334003141988noreply@blogger.com